Alternative Investments

It has been a good run. Ten years after the 2008 “meltdown,” the bull market in securities is beginning to show its age. And, after a very placid 2017, volatility in the market is showing it’s alive and well. That volatility has been driven by interest rate expectations, trade/tariff discussions, and the mid-term elections. The elections are (mostly) behind us, but volatility may still be around for a while. Investors have made some money with this long bull market; now the goal is to protect those gains.

 Alternative investments can play a major role in hedging risk in the stock market; however, there are many different hedging strategies available. Many investors are not familiar with these strategies or how to access them. In general, there are two broad categories of alternatives: 1) those investments offering diversification from the stock market, and 2) those investments that reduce risk of loss of portfolio value while still maintaining some return potential.

Access to hedging strategies used to be a major problem; lack of liquidity (the ability to easily buy and sell) being a prime example. Many of these strategies are now available in a mutual fund format. Shares can be purchased or sold daily with valuations set at the end of the day. Some strategies are available as exchange traded funds (ETFs) which provide intra-day liquidity.

Correlation

Correlation is an analysis of the relationship of two data variables, or how the variables move in relation to each other. Normally this relationship is combined into a single number—the correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient can have a value of +1 to -1. A value of 0 indicates that the variables have no relationship, i.e. they are independent. Positive values (>0) imply that when one variable goes up, the other variable goes up also. Negative values (<0) imply that wen one variable goes up, the other variable goes down. The magnitude of the number (the closer the coefficient is to a value of +/- 1) explains the degree to which moves in one variable are like moves in the other variable.

Diversification Alternatives

Since most investment portfolios contain stocks, alternative strategies which have a lower correlation to them can provide diversification benefits. Listed below are three strategies which have lower correlations to the S&P 500 over the last 10 years.

• Managed Futures- A fund manager utilizing this strategy usually invests in different asset classes (both long and short positions) depending on the manager’s analysis of which asset classes are going to increase or decrease. Successful ability to capture both rising and falling markets have a substantially different return profile from the stock market—a correlation coefficient of about -0.10.
• Market Neutral- A market neutral manager usually has a portfolio long (owned) on stocks the manager expects to rise and short (sold) on stocks the manager expects to under-perform the market. When the portfolio has similar long and short holdings, the return of the portfolio has returns less related to the stock market- a correlation coefficient of about +0.34
• Multi-currency- A multi-currency manager usually invests in different currencies depending on the manager’s perceived relative strength. Since returns are usually different between stocks and fixed income investments, this strategy has had a correlation coefficient of +0.48.

Risk Reduction Alternatives

Ideally, investors would like a diversification strategy that doesn’t significantly sacrifice returns. Such strategies would not only have less losses in down equity markets, but would also have more positive returns in up equity markets. Over longer time periods, these alternatives would outperform those alternatives that provide only downside risk mitigation. Examples include the following:

• Long/Short Equity- A long/short manager usually has a long (owns) position in stocks in which the manager expects to outperform the market and short (sells) stocks which are expected to under-perform the market. The manager may use the sale proceeds from the short positions to increase his/her holdings in the long positions.
• Non-traditional Bonds-Such a manager usually has the ability to invest in bonds of varying maturities, differing credit quality, differing economic sectors, or varying geographic areas as the manager perceives have value. A successful manager has the ability to move according to interest rate changes and other variables affecting the returns markets.

The Bottom Line

Make no mistake—investing involves risk! So does putting money under the mattress in times of inflation. However, if one can mitigate risk (even in a minor way), it surely is worth the effort. Please contact us at Paragon Financial Advisors to see if such alternative investments might benefit your investment portfolio.  Paragon Financial Advisors is a fee only registered investment advisory company located in College Station, TX.  We offer financial planning and investment management services to our clients.

Social Security, Medicare, and You

Each year the Trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds provide a report on the financial status of these programs—current and projected. The information below is from a summary of the 2016 Annual Reports www.ssa.gov, Office of the Chief Actuary, 2016 Trustees Report-Jacob J. Lew, Sec. of the Treasury and Managing Trustee, and Thomas E. Perez, Sec. of Labor, and Trustee).
 
In general, both programs (as currently scheduled) are facing funding shortfalls. Social Security and Medicare accounted for about 41% of Federal program spending in 2015. Both programs will have cost growth in excess of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth through the mid-2030s. This shortfall is due to: 1) growth in the aging population (baby boomers beginning retirement—about 10,000 per day) eligible for benefits, and 2) fewer employees entering the labor market (because of lower birth rates) to fund the programs. Medicare expenditures per beneficiary are also projected to increase above the growth in per capita GDP over the same time period.
 
Social Security
 
Social Security has two separate trust funds to provide benefits for two programs: 1) Old Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI), and 2) Disability Insurance (DI). Although the trust funds are technically separate, the Trustees typically combine the funds to provide the actuarial financial status for the total plan. Funding for plan benefits comes from combined payroll taxes from both employees and employers. Current benefit payments to plan recipients are paid from these payroll taxes and any excess payment is scheduled to be added to a “trust fund” to provide for future benefit payments. In the 2016 report, the Trustees project that combined fund asset reserves will exceed projected benefit costs through 2028; benefit payments will then begin to dip into trust fund reserves. Trustees currently project that those trust funds will be depleted in 2034. When the funds are depleted, projected tax income is sufficient to pay about three-quarters of projected benefits through 2090.
 
Medicare
 
The Medicare program also has two trust funds: 1) Hospital Insurance Trust Fund (Part A), and 2) Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund (Parts B and D). Part A of Medicare helps pay for the cost of hospitalization, home health care following hospital stays, skilled nursing care, and hospice care for the elderly and disabled. Part B of Medicare helps pay for the costs of physicians, outpatient hospitalization, and home health services. Part D subsidizes the cost of drug coverage.
 
The Trustees project that the Part A trust fund will be depleted in 2028 (two years sooner than projections in the 2015 report). Part A expenditures have been exceeding income received since 2008; at fund depletion in 2028, revenues are projected to pay 87% of Part A costs. Parts B and D are adequately funded because current law allows funding from both general revenues and beneficiary premiums. However, because of an aging population and increasing health care costs, the cost of Parts B and D are expected to grow from 2.1% of GDP in 2015 to about 3.5% of GDP in 2037.  Trustee projections in the 2016 report are that total Medicare expenditures will grow from about 3.6% of GDP in 2015 to 5.6% of GDP in 2040. The costs are projected to increase to about 6.0% of GDP in 2090.
 
The Bottom Line
 
Social Security and Medicare benefits are a key component in long range planning for most individuals. The 2016 Trustee Report indicates that changes in these plans will be forthcoming. Please contact us at Paragon Financial Advisors to see how your future plans may be affected.  Paragon Financial Advisors is a fee only registered investment advisory company located in College Station, TX.  We offer financial planning and investment management services to our clients.

Old Age and Retirement

The World Economic Forum produced a white paper entitled “We’ll Live to 100-How Can We Afford It?” (Lead Author, Rachel Wheeler, Project Lead, May 2017) The basic premise of this white paper was the status of world-wide retirement plans and potential problems and reforms necessary to address those problems. The disclaimer in the white paper is that “…views in this White Paper … do not necessarily represent the views of the World Economic Forum or its Members…” In addition, these papers “… describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and further debate.” The report is “… part of the Forum’s Retirement Investment Systems Reform project that has brought together pension experts to assess opportunities for reforms that can be adopted to improve the likelihood of our retirement systems adequately and sustainably supporting future generations.” The paper, in its entirety, can be accessed at  http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_White_Paper_We_Will_Live_to_100.pdf  Our discussion in this posting is done without comment or endorsement of the contents of the white paper. However, in light of the positions taken by some candidates in the 2016 US Presidential election, it behooves us to look at some propositions being espoused in the academic community and conditions that exist in the international community.

Old Age

Life expectancy is increasing. For individuals born in 1947, the median life expectancy is 85 years; for those born in 2007, it is age 103. The increased life expectancy leads to a longer working career. If retirement age remains unchanged and current birth rates continue, the global dependency ratio (the ratio of the workforce to retirees) will decrease from 8:1 today to 4:1 by 2050. The position taken in the Forum’s white paper “…focuses on the sustainability and affordability of our current retirement systems.” Retirement “…system needs to be affordable for today’s workers and sustainable for future generations…"

Challenges to Retirement Systems

 

The primary causes of retirement systems problems, according to white paper authors, are increasing life expectancy and a declining birth rate. The authors identify five additional factors affecting global retirement systems:

1. Lack of access to pensions- Many workers (especially the self-employed) don’t have access to pension plans or savings products. Over 50% of global workers work in the informal or unorganized sectors of the economy. Forty-eight percent (48%) of retirement age people don’t receive a pension.
2. Low investment returns- Long term investment returns over the last 10 years have been significantly lower than historical averages. Equities have returned 3-5% below averages; bonds, 1-3% below. These lower returns have exacerbated pension plan shortfalls and reduced individual retirement savings balances.
3. Personal responsibility for pension plan management- Defined benefit plans have been decreasing in number while the number of defined contribution plans has been increasing. Defined contribution plans now account for over 50% of global retirement assets. The investment risk has thus been shifted from the employer to the employee.
4. Low levels of financial literacy- While investment risk has been shifted to the individual, the ability of those individuals to make sound investment decisions appears to be lacking. Most people are not able to correctly answer questions on basic financial concepts.
5. Inadequate savings- Individual savings in all countries are well below the 10-15% level necessary to fund a reasonable retirement income.

The Retirement Savings Gap

 

Historically, retirement income has come from three sources: 1) governmental sources (Social Security, etc.), 2) employer pension plans, and 3) individual savings. According to the authors of the white paper, the world-wide retirement savings gap in 2015 is estimated to be approximately $70 trillion with the largest shortfall being in the US. Of that gap, 75% is in the government and public pension obligation, 1% in unfunded corporate pension plans, and 24% in lack of personal savings. This gap is predicated on a 70% income replacement in retirement.

 

The Findings

 

The authors of the white paper espoused three key areas to address overall financial security:

• Provide a “safety net” pension for all persons
• Improve access to effective, efficient retirement plans
• Increase personal savings initiatives

The authors of the paper state:

 

“Poverty protection for the elderly should be the minimum requirement for any government pension system. It should be the responsibility of the government to provide a pension income for all citizens that acts at a “safety net” and prevents those who miss out on other forms of pension provision from dropping below the poverty line.”

 

“In countries where there are challenges to establish employer-based or individual pension schemes, introducing universal pension benefits may be the only way to significantly reduce poverty among the elderly.”

 

“Technology can make saving automatic by deducting contributions directly from employees’ pay before it reaches their personal accounts.” “Governments can make it compulsory for all employers to automatically enroll new employees into a retirement savings account and to contribute on their behalf.” (italics added)

 

Principles for Change

 

Authors of the white paper identified four principles that they felt should be addressed in retirement plan provisions.

 

Principle 1: The work force is changing. Occupations that are most sought after today didn’t exist 10 years ago. In addition, about 65% of today’s primary school children will work in jobs that don’t yet exist. The number of workers over age 65 is increasing; it has more than doubled since 1995. The number of employers for whom a person works over his/her career is increasing. That requires “re-tooling” work skills and portability of job benefits.

 

Principle 2: There is a gender imbalance. Retirement balances for women are 30-40% below those for men. Longer periods out of the workforce and lower salaries in general contribute to the lower retirement account balances. In addition, the longer life expectancy of women means those reduced assets need to cover a longer period of time. Unisex life expectancy tables and valuing work performed outside the workplace for retirement benefits could help alleviate this disparity.

 

Principle 3: Shared risks could reduce individual burdens. Collective defined contribution systems (as employed in some countries, such as Canada) could help with the burden on individuals for their retirement savings, account management, life expectancy, etc. Pooled money and risks could be based on “target” benefits. An example of such a plan, as presented by the authors, is shown below.

Defined Benefit Plan	Collective Defined Contribution Plan	Defined Contribution Plan
Pooled assets across all accounts	Pooled assets or notional accounts	Individual accounts
Predominantly employer contributions	Combination employer and individual contributions	Combination employer and individual contributions
Trustees determine investment policy and investments	Trustees determine investment policy and investments	Individual makes investment decisions
Trustees takes investment risk	Investment risk pooled	Individual takes investment risk
Trustees takes longevity risk	Longevity risk pooled	No longevity protection
Guaranteed pension	Target pension, not guaranteed	No target or guaranteed pension

Principle 4: All financial needs should be considered. People who save early for retirement will have much larger retirement savings than those who start later. However, retirement savings may not be a priority for younger employees. Therefore, the authors contend, the full financial picture (assets and debts) should be considered for financial need.

The Bottom Line

When one reads the World Economic Forum white paper and analyzes its recommendations, it is obvious that items presented are significantly different than what we have in the US today. However, as we examine our current public benefit systems (Social Security), it is also obvious that some changes must be made. Prudent financial planning means looking at alternatives and trying to plan for what “might happen.” Visit us at Paragon Financial Advisors to review your individual circumstances. Paragon Financial Advisors is a fee only registered investment advisory company located in College Station, TX.  We offer financial planning and investment management services to our clients.

 

           

Factors in Retirement-Longevity and Working Career

In previous postings, we discussed some of the factors facing prospective/current retirees. These factors were classified in three general categories: 1) factors over which we have total control, 2) factors over which we have some control, and 3) factors over which we have no control. The second category (factors over which we have some control) included:

1. Longevity, and
2. Employment earnings and duration.

The second category is the subject of today’s posting.

 

Longevity

 

Genetic factors play a significant role in how long we live; so do life style choices. While individual life spans are difficult to predict, actuarial data allow us to view life spans in aggregate. First, women live longer than men and life span has been increasing.

 

Average Life Expectancy at Age 65¹

Year	Women	Men	Difference
1990	84.1	80.1	4.0
2015	85.5	83.1	2.4

Second, if you are 65 today, then:

Probability of Living at Least to (or Beyond) a Specific Age²

Age	Women	Men	Couple (1 alive)
75	85%	73%	97%
80	73	63	90
85	55	43	74
90	33	22	48
95	13	7	20
100	3	1	4

These figures are mid-points, not an end-point. The bottom line: you may need to plan on living much longer in retirement (perhaps as long as your working career). Consequently, a portion of your investment portfolio should be structured for growth in order to maintain purchasing power over the retirement years.

Employment Duration

Income in retirement has been compared to a “three legged stool” composed of pensions, Social Security, and investment/savings. Now a fourth leg has been added (a chair??) with employment income in retirement. As the population ages, the percent of older people in the work force has been increasing. In 1994 there were 31 million people age 65+ in the civilian population; that number had risen to 45 million in 2014 and is projected to be 62 million in 2024.³  By age groups, the number working is even more interesting.

Percent of Individuals in the Civilian Labor Force³

Age	1994	2004	2014	2024 (Est.)
65-69	22%	28%	32%	36%
70-74	12	15	19	23
75-79	7	9	11	14

People work in retirement for various reasons:

Major Reasons People Work in Retirement⁴

Reason	Need	Desire
Buy extras	26%	-
Make ends meet	25	-
Keep insurance/benefits	23	-
Decreased value of savings/investments	21	-
Stay active/involved	-	56%
Enjoy working	-	54
Job opportunity	-	24
Try new career	-	8

Finally, the age at which one retires is not always the date of anticipated retirement. Sixty-seven percent of workers expected to retire at age 65 or older. Only 23% retired as planned; the actual median retirement age was 62.⁵ Reasons for earlier retirement included the following:

Reasons for Retiring Earlier Than Planned⁵

Reason	Percent
Health problems/disability	60
Employer changes (downsizing/closings)	27
Other work related items	22
Care for spouse/family member	22
Superannuated work skills	10
Ability to afford early retirement	31
Choose to do something else	17

The Bottom Line

The “law of large numbers” whereby we look at aggregate statistics can provide some information for use in financial planning. Those “large numbers” indicate that an individual may have a much longer time in retirement than anticipated, and there may be fewer working years to save for retirement. Individual circumstances vary of course; please see us at Paragon Financial Advisors to review your “retirement readiness.”  Paragon Financial Advisors is a fee-only registered investment advisory company located in College Station, Texas.  We offer financial planning and investment management services to our clients. 

 

¹ Social Security Administration 2016 OASDI Trustees Report

² Social Security Administration Period Life Table 2013 (published 2016)

³ Bureau of Labor Statistics, Monthly Labor Review, December 2015

⁴ Employee Benefit Research Institute, Matthew Greenwald & Assoc. Inc. 2014 Retirement Confidence Survey

⁵ Employee Benefit Research Institute, Matthew Greenwald & Assoc. Inc., 2016 Retirement Confidence Survey